notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2010-03-09

post/436960907

photo 15:23:23
Today’s Pictures: Celling It. Martin Parr, Ascot, 1999, for Magnum Photos. (The entire set is worth a look.)

Today’s Pictures: Celling It. Martin Parr, Ascot, 1999, for Magnum Photos. (The entire set is worth a look.)

post/436567543

quote 09:40:06
“ Ben Terrett’s Newspaper Club won in the Graphics category in the Design Of The Year thingat the Design Museum. Which I’m especially pleased about because, if anything, what we do is remove the graphic design from things. ”
Russell Davies, in 1966 weeks, his weeknote.

post/436506934

photo 08:39:00
An original Marks Barfield sketch of the London Eye, from a BBC News selection of pictures to mark the tenth anniversary of its opening.

An original Marks Barfield sketch of the London Eye, from a BBC News selection of pictures to mark the tenth anniversary of its opening.

2010-03-08

post/434631791

photo 13:23:00
Maurice Broomfield’s photographs of industrial Britain, from the FT. Paper-making, Bowater Paper Company, Thames Mill, Northfleet, 1960.

Maurice Broomfield’s photographs of industrial Britain, from the FT. Paper-making, Bowater Paper Company, Thames Mill, Northfleet, 1960.

Licence Fees Across Europe

text 11:26:00

After reading one too many commentary pieces on the fall-out of the BBC’s Digital Strategy Review, and hearing the odd friend suggest that the British didn’t know how good they had it, I decided to complile a Google spreadsheet of TV licence fees across Europe.

Once I had a first version out, Chris suggested that I should add a column stating whether there was an ad-free state broadcaster, and that’s there now; there’s also a heatmap visualisation.

Unfortunately, the GBP Equivalent column seems a bit fragile- Google Finance hiccups every now and again and it doesn’t work. Publishing also seems not to allow nice formatting (‘£145.20’ not ‘145.2’), so I’m linking directly to the editing page. Still, hopefully there’s stuff of interest for people there.

2010-03-06

The British Junk Food Report

text 09:20:00

rentzsch wrote an interesting post on some of the junk food he tried while in the UK for NSConference:

The absolute most-important thing for a U.S.-based traveler to the U.K. is knowing what junk food you should load up on while there. Here’s our report:

  • Kit Kat Chunky: DON’T BUY. There are far better things to spend 260 (!) calories on.

Really? I love Kit Kat Chunky, although I have a particularly soft spot for the allegedly limited edition Caramel variant. Maybe I’m just dull, or perhaps the mix of biscuit and chocolate is just more my sort of thing.

  • Wispa: BUY. This was the least-interesting bar to me, but came up the biggest winner.

    Its very concept didn’t appeal to me: an “aerated” chocolate bar. More than anything, it seemed like a hack to give you less chocolate for the same price.

    If you try only one chocolate bar while in the UK, I recommend Wispa.

  • Wispa has a competitor, Aero, which is more air, less chocolate. It also comes in a mint version. Personally I find them a bit too light, but occasionally they’re right.

    • Wheatabix: BUY. Apparently these are State-side, but I never noticed or tried them until I arrived in London. They’re like a fine-grained Shredded Wheat that dissolves much more rapidly in milk. Yummy, if you’re the kind who likes soggy shredded wheat (I do).

    Minor correction: the product is called Weetabix. I don’t eat breakfast cereals, though, so I have no other comment.

    (Tumblr is stripping the style attributes from the span tags. Sigh.)

    2010-03-05

    post/428153070

    quote 11:58:46
    “ Tories might reread Labour’s 1983 manifesto and accept that although the big economic argument of that year (private ownership or public ownership?) has been won, the big sociocultural argument (Christian traditionalism or secular pluralism?) has been lost. Given its stress on economic planning, Labour’s 1983 manifesto does look archaic. But so does the 1983 Tory manifesto, given its stress on marriage-based households and its reluctance to admit alternative family structures. ”
    Richard Kelly, writing in New Statesman in 2003: Not as daft as you thought, on the only Labour general election manifesto while Michael Foot was leader.

    2010-03-04

    post/426163795

    quote 12:48:04
    “ The BBC’s own Public Purposes, stated in its own charter [all] bellow for investment in network internet content, which will increasingly, inevitably, ineluctably do a better job of achieving these purposes than TV, whether broadcast or on-demand. […] Rather “the Internet” is again and again stated to be core to the future of the way the BBC reaches its audiences — but only if the output of the BBC is restricted to linear programming and the internet is a new pipe for this linear programming. ”
    Paul Bennun at Somethin’ Else posting a Our Response to the BBC Strategic Review.

    post/426161147

    quote 12:45:43
    “ The [report] is a concession to the whiskery rightwing argument that the BBC should meet only those needs that are not provided for elsewhere. If the BBC has no need to address teens because C4 already does that, why does it bother with sport, given that Sky does that; or news, since there’s always ITN? Follow that logic, and the corporation would end up exactly where its commercial rivals want it to be: as a subscriber service for a handful of tiny audiences whose niche tastes are so unprofitable no one else will cater to them. ”

    Jonathan Freedland, in a comment piece for the GuardianThe BBC is caving in to a Tory media policy dictated by Rupert Murdoch.

    Some would argue that this is a reductio ad absurdum argument, but I think it gets to the heart of why I’m worried about the report: if the BBC is shrinking, where will it stop?

    (My main disagreement with his piece is the blithe acceptance that online content can be scaled back, but I’ve covered that elsewhere.)

    post/426123615

    photo 12:11:32
    Westminster really seems to have some sort of fever for redesiging its major junctions at the moment. Piccadilly Circus is next, according to the BBC:

Piccadilly Circus will be made pedestrian-friendly as part of a £14m revamp, which will rid the busy central London junction of guard railings.
Westminster Council approved the plan that will see the area go back to what it looked like in 1963, as more than one kilometre of railings are uprooted.
A central island will be built along Piccadilly and Pall Mall and two-way traffic will be reintroduced.

Meanwhile, the firm that planned the revamp of Oxford Circus last year (previously) reports that it’s worked out:
The Atkins-designed Oxford Circus diagonal crossing has proven an instant success with reduced pavement congestion, a doubling of walking speeds and one in six visitors using the diagonal routes.

    Westminster really seems to have some sort of fever for redesiging its major junctions at the moment. Piccadilly Circus is next, according to the BBC:

    Piccadilly Circus will be made pedestrian-friendly as part of a £14m revamp, which will rid the busy central London junction of guard railings.

    Westminster Council approved the plan that will see the area go back to what it looked like in 1963, as more than one kilometre of railings are uprooted.

    A central island will be built along Piccadilly and Pall Mall and two-way traffic will be reintroduced.

    Meanwhile, the firm that planned the revamp of Oxford Circus last year (previously) reports that it’s worked out:

    The Atkins-designed Oxford Circus diagonal crossing has proven an instant success with reduced pavement congestion, a doubling of walking speeds and one in six visitors using the diagonal routes.

    about

    pages

    options