notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2009-07-13

In Praise Of Tumblr

text 22:10:00

It’s been a couple of weeks since Mashable’s comparative review of Tumblr and Posterous was published, and since then I’ve noticed a few of my friends trying out the latter service. I thought it was time I explained some of the reasons I’ve found Tumblr to be such a good fit for me, and why I think the review was a little unfair.

Posterous’ knockout posting punch is email — the technology that most of us take for granted on a daily basis.

Other people might still be email-centric, but I’ve long since moved to the browser rather than the email client for everything. (Surely the popularity of Gmail proves I’m not alone?) Tumblr’s excellent (and recently upgraded) bookmarklet is fantastic for easily posting images found online. Meanwhile, the composing pages on the web are wonderful: lightweight in just the way MT, Wordpress and Vox aren’t. OK, it’s not quite as simple as Twitter, but then, I couldn’t put this in 140 characters. Relatively friction-free posting makes me write far more (just compare the frequency of posts here to that over on my grown-up blog).

Tumblr’s also got something else that, sadly, nobody else has quite nailed - community. Since I gave up RSS in 2004 or so (I’ve since relented, a little) I’ve used the network/friends/contacts pages on the sites I use most to follow what’s up. Twitter, Flickr and delicious all do this really well, and so does Tumblr, with the Dashboard. Once you’re logged in it’s easy to follow another Tumblr user, and keep up with what they’re doing. (If you’re that sort of person, you can even drag in your Twitter friends updates. I don’t.)

Beyond that, though, there’s reblogging. Unlike the folk practice of retweeting, which is broken in more ways than I can be bothered to list, Tumblr’s feature is right on the money. Attribution and feedback are nicely handled within the dashboard. It even makes the decision of the site’s founders not to have comments a minor drawback rather than a killer - you can always add something to a post and end up with a real conversation, which is actually readable in future. Compared with Twitter or any other blogging platform, that’s a real achievement.

Suffice it to say, Posterous has nothing like either feature. If I run across your blog and want to follow it, I have to use feeds. (Obviously, Tumblr does offer RSS, if you want it.) You might not see this as a drawback, but nowadays, I think I would.

[Edit] I had another look, and it turns out Posterous does offer subscriptions. That’s still not as impressive as reblogging, but I thought I should mention it.

What else? I really like Tumblr’s per-month archive pages (Posterous only has per-tag). Tumblr has a good customisation engine, which I’ve used to make this site look like my main one (whereas Posterous locks you into a pleasant, but anodyne, theme). I’ve used a custom domain; although you can do that on Posterous too, Tumblr’s implementation is quite good. The “popular” pages gives a window into the community (even if it’s occasionally a bit scary). On top of all that, Tumblr has a straightforward API for import and export (which also makes me feel like I own my data; like edd, I find this pretty important).

Is Tumblr perfect? Of course not. The theme engine isn’t infinitely flexible, and getting an export isn’t one-click easy, when it could be. There are niggling missing pieces (I’d like per-tag RSS, for example), but all in all, it’s a pretty flexible, easy, and pleasant platform. I can see myself staying here for quite some while.

about

posts

tags

notes

  1. blech posted this

options