notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2011-12-19

post/14470226871

quote 20:46:00
“ I don’t think there’s anything that wrong with LEGO doing it, so much as there is with the people quoted in the article- and frankly, the person writing the post I’m reblogging- assuming that girls won’t want to play with the legos that are there, the aliens and fire fighters and police. And while it is true that there are more lego face that have gender now, with beards or pronounced lips, there are still a LOT that don’t, and that I have made into females with hairstyle or simply story (if they’re wearing a helmet) on many occasions. ”

evalilith, replying to my Lego post.

I don’t assume girls don’t like Lego; I’m sure there are plenty (perhaps even a majority) who love it, or would given the chance to play. (I have a nasty feeling that as the older brother I hogged the bricks when I played with my sister as a child.) I love to hear that friends have bought their niece one of the Creator sets.

Perhaps think the point I was trying (and probably failing) to make is that, as the article makes clear, that there are parents (and perhaps girls) who have decided that Lego is somehow for boys, some children’s imaginative reuse of minfigs notwithstanding. Their own sales figures and market research back that up.

I don’t particularly like it any more than the thousands of people who’ve commented on the Friends launch, but I am maybe more forgiving of Lego-the-corporation in making an effort to design, and (yes) market, products for a part of the population who aren’t buying as much of their stuff.

what

more

posts

tags

notes (17)

  1. singaporelegofriends00 reblogged this from evalilith
  2. bethanne-allison reblogged this from evalilith
  3. evalilith reblogged this from blech and added:
    And I mostly agree with you, I just felt that your previous comments read mostly as the toys actually being gendered as...
  4. blech reblogged this from evalilith
  5. blech posted this