redesigning graphics from 1950s science textbooks by R.A. Gallant (via Wired)
I wonder if I’m the only person to find the originals better than the remakes? They’re far less fussy and seem to be somewhat clearer. The newer versions put too much effort into being pretty.
Maybe I’m just old.
sansotto reblogged this from fuckyeahgraphicdesign
pixeloftrash reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful
dstumblog liked this
dvplus liked this
fuckyeahgraphicdesign reblogged this from feltron
joeydi liked this
triedge reblogged this from proofmathisbeautiful
smtwtfs liked this
jashi liked this
freshphotons liked this
summerinabowl liked this
proofmathisbeautiful reblogged this from cloois
spinynorman reblogged this from feltron and added:
Yuck. BSAG is correct: the new version is clogged with distracting effects that detract
bsag reblogged this from blech and added:
I agree. It’s a good example of pointless 3D graphics making it much harder to see where the points fall on the y-axis....
benjaminhilts liked this
blech reblogged this from roomthily and added:
I wonder if I’m the only person to find the originals better than the remakes? They’re far less fussy and seem to be...
tender liked this
hiten liked this
cloudworld liked this
volume-control reblogged this from feltron
chrisbowler liked this
reillybrennan liked this
blogthomas reblogged this from feltron
cloois reblogged this from feltron and added:
redesigning graphics...1950s science textbooks by R.A. Gallant (feltron:roomthily:Wired)
kxr liked this
mylittletidbits liked this
johncoltrane reblogged this from feltron
feltron reblogged this from roomthily and added:
This was an amazing section...the last issue… roomthily:
hawkw reblogged this from roomthily
roomthily posted this
