notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2012-09-02

post/30757319656

quote 23:56:47

Did you know that, currently, only 12 percent of individual health insurance policies offer coverage for basic maternity care? That such coverage is mandated by only eight states? I didn’t, until suddenly I did.

Carriers in states without a mandate may offer coverage in the form of a rider, a package of benefits above and beyond the basics. But in addition to being expensive, and often sorely limited in scope, these riders, it turns out, are not something you can opt into once you become, in fact, pregnant. Because, of course, at that point your pregnancy is a pre-existing condition.

Thankfully, a phone call to my own carrier, Aetna, informed me that it was a moot point. Because, not only does Aetna not offer maternity coverage as part of my carefully acquired insurance package, it does not offer any maternity coverage at all, even as a rider, on any individual benefits package.

Babies, it turns out, are not cost-effective for the insurance industry. Because, guess what? When women purchase maternity coverage, it’s a pretty good bet they plan to use it.

The base cost of nine months of prenatal and three months of postpartum medical care for a routine pregnancy and delivery is estimated at $10,000.

Martha Bane: Knocked Over: On Biology, Magical Thinking And Choice at The Rumpus.

Read it. Then read how a Republican lost her fear of Canada’s Universal Health Care system.

what

more

posts

tags

notes (4)

  1. iamdanw reblogged this from blech
  2. timetogetbuckwild reblogged this from cheertheeffup
  3. cheertheeffup reblogged this from blech
  4. blech posted this