notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2010-12-05

2010-08-26

post/1015028521

quote 18:04:00
“ However, for design guru Stephen Bayley, the passport’s references to our maritime history, dry stone walls and Blenheim Palace are nothing more than cliches, symbolising the “British disease of a soft-focus nostalgia for a past that never was”. ”
BBC News, quoting Stephen Bayley, asking What do new passport images say about modern Britain?

2010-01-28

post/358054639

quote 16:15:04
“ The Greater London Authority has confirmed that Saffron Brand Consultants has won the Brand for London tender to create a visual identity for the capital. ”

Saffron confirmed as Brand for London winner

via Dave Hill, who notes that Saffron is chaired by Wally Olins, formerly of Wolff Olins, designer of the London 2012 identity.

Oh dear. I’d kind of hoped the nonsense had gone away. (via teflon)

2009-09-30

post/201168284

photo 21:39:48
“New British Rail branding on a wine glass”, from the National Railway Museum’s “1968” site. Looks like a wonderful exhibition; shame I missed it.

“New British Rail branding on a wine glass”, from the National Railway Museum’s “1968” site. Looks like a wonderful exhibition; shame I missed it.

2009-08-30

post/175660708

quote 20:55:55
“ Getting an iconic logo or strapline from a pitch process is akin to winning the lottery. Think of all the cities in the world, and how few you associate with a design. Whilst a good design or idea can be a starting point, the real work is in execution. ”

Chris Heathcote, lights of London, talking about the branding for London exercise I mentioned earlier.

The whole thing is worth a read, and is a much more coherent take than the one I posted earlier. Of note is the fact that Chris properly conveys that Moving Brands are just one of many organisations pitching, and his great point that, for the logo to work, it has to be free.

Branding London

text 08:34:00

teflon:

A Brand for London

Moving Brands are pitching for the tender for a new brand for London, and are making their development work an open process via this blog.

Well, it’s a nice site, and none of the suggestions make me reel in horror, but: why does London even need a brand?

The about page has this image:

which apparently means we need a I♥NY style identity. Why, though? London’s sense of self is strong enough that it gets by without one, or a flag. Hell, it got through fifteen years without a government. Londoners know what the city is. Tourists do as well, even if they have a somewhat different perception of it.

If upstart cities like New York think they need a logo, fine. We’re better than that.

2009-06-19

post/126513828

quote 17:08:34
“ Didn’t Pizza Hut get rebranded as Pasta Hut last year? Or was that an UK only thing? ”

iamdanw on Pizza Hut’s possible rebranding to “The Hut” (via Lee, marco)

Yes, this was just a UK thing, and more to the point, it was pretty much a naked publicity stunt. Entirely unsurprisingly, a poll after a few months (on Facebook, if I’m remembering correctly) resulted in the name reverting, with a huge majority for the Pizza Hut brand.

This is all remembered from last week’s episode of Radio 4’s Bottom Line, which featured Jens Hofma, chief executive of Pizza Hut UK, and which you can still hear with Listen Again (possibly only in the UK). He doesn’t quite admit it was all done for the coverage, but he doesn’t exactly deny it either.

about

options