notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2012-05-03

post/22335271689

quote 21:14:03

On April 27th the world’s biggest pop star of the moment, the New York City-born Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta (aka Lady Gaga) kicked off her enormous world tour with a sell-out concert —in Seoul, the capital of South Korea, followed by a date in Hong Kong, before going on to Bangkok, Singapore and Jakarta. Surprising, perhaps, as any self-respecting Western pop superstar used to begin their world tours almost exclusively in America or Britain.

Does her “Born this Way ball” tour provide yet more evidence that the economic pendulum has now made its full swing from West to East? Alan Ridgeway, the worldwide promoter for the shows, certainly seems to think so.

Americans will have to wait until next year. And what of poor old downgraded Europe? The little monsters there will have to wait until September or October to see their idol. And it looks as if someone from Standard & Poor’s might have drawn up the itinerary.

2012-04-13

post/20992506116

quote 00:57:12
“ Date (month, day, year) ”

post/20992359768

quote 00:54:00
“ dateFormat: String. Default ‘mm/dd/yy’. The format for parsed and displayed dates. ”
mobiscroll - API Documentation. mobiscroll is a “Wheel scroller/Date and Time picker jQuery plugin for touch devices (Android phones, iPhone, iPad, Galaxy Tab”.

post/20991772701

quote 00:46:02
“ mktime’s arguments are, in order: hour, minute, second, month, day, year. ”

post/20991768180

quote 00:45:58
“ birthday: The user’s birthday. Date string in MM/DD/YYYY format. ”
A user profile as represented in the Graph API”, from the Facebook Developers documentation.

2010-10-21

post/1368408469

quote 22:06:49
“ More people need to do stupid shit. I mean that from the bottom of my heart. Don’t do it to make money. Don’t even do it to learn hip new technology X. Do it for the sake of doing something stupid. ”
Zack Holmen, author of Facelette: On TechCrunch in Three Hours and $0. Or, as I’d put it: In Praise Of Hobby Programming.

2010-08-25

post/1009199176

photo 16:17:00
 
I’ve been using Autostitch iPhone a lot this summer. It makes it easy to combine shots and so makes wide-angle panoramic photos a possibility, despite the fixed field of view of the phone’s camera. (You can see an cropped example, of Tromsø from the Hurtigruten coastal steamer, on Flickr. Above is the raw image that the phone produced.)
However, not all of my photos are with the iPhone, and so I need a desktop equivalent too. So I downloaded four Mac panorama stitchers and ran some photos I had previously stitched on the phone together.


Annoyingly, despite all costing at least ten times as much, they (with one exception) all performed far worse. Calico Panorama at least managed to get everything in the right place, and smoothed out the variations in exposure (which are unavoidable without manual controls). AutoPano Pro was also competent, but that UI is eyebleedingly awful. PTgui also did fairly well, but DoubleTake was clearly completely confused.


I also tried PhotoStitch, which was bundled with the Canon PowerShot S90 I recently bought. It needed to be told what the alignment was, and crashed after producing a version that was worse even than DoubleTake’s attempt. Poor show.
I suspect I’ll try a few more sets of images in Calico before deciding whether or not to stump up the cash, but there seems to be a wider lesson here. A piece of $2 software with barely any UI feels more able to do its job than a variety of desktop applications costing anywhere from $20 to $80, and it’s making me consider rethinking my workflow just to take advantage of it.

I’ve been using Autostitch iPhone a lot this summer. It makes it easy to combine shots and so makes wide-angle panoramic photos a possibility, despite the fixed field of view of the phone’s camera. (You can see an cropped example, of Tromsø from the Hurtigruten coastal steamer, on Flickr. Above is the raw image that the phone produced.)

However, not all of my photos are with the iPhone, and so I need a desktop equivalent too. So I downloaded four Mac panorama stitchers and ran some photos I had previously stitched on the phone together.

Calico

Annoyingly, despite all costing at least ten times as much, they (with one exception) all performed far worse. Calico Panorama at least managed to get everything in the right place, and smoothed out the variations in exposure (which are unavoidable without manual controls). AutoPano Pro was also competent, but that UI is eyebleedingly awful. PTgui also did fairly well, but DoubleTake was clearly completely confused.

I also tried PhotoStitch, which was bundled with the Canon PowerShot S90 I recently bought. It needed to be told what the alignment was, and crashed after producing a version that was worse even than DoubleTake’s attempt. Poor show.

I suspect I’ll try a few more sets of images in Calico before deciding whether or not to stump up the cash, but there seems to be a wider lesson here. A piece of $2 software with barely any UI feels more able to do its job than a variety of desktop applications costing anywhere from $20 to $80, and it’s making me consider rethinking my workflow just to take advantage of it.

2010-01-19

post/342515781

quote 11:07:32
“ For consumer web apps today, design matters more than technology. Much has been written about how the cloud, accessible web frameworks, etc. have dramatically lowered the cost of getting a startup to market, and that’s certainly true, but it also means that since everyone is on EC2 and Ruby on Rails, technology is no longer what differentiates most consumer web apps. What does is design. ”

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, talking about Tumblr vs Posterous (via knaveofdiamonds)

I’d take issue with the “everyone is on EC2 and RoR” part. While the EC2 bit feels right for new projects - everything I worked on at Six to Start over the last year has been hosted there - I’d argue there’s a good selection of Django and PHP+framework apps as well as Rails ones. As for the older social networks, most of them use PHP; Flickr, Facebook and Delicious, for example.

Still, I think the general point is correct: given a decent framework and a good developer, prototyping and even scaling are now much better understood, and available, than they were five (or even three) years ago. How your service works, however, is still a key selling point.

2010-01-07

“How to build an iPhone app”

text 17:13:00

According to Wired UK:

3. Prototype

Now draw your idea. Making paper models and moving things around on a table is a much simpler way to test the app than coding it up and hoping for the best. Have lots of people try out the paper prototype. Only when you’re happy with your paper design should you have it turned into code.

4. Submit, release

Now you have a working app, you’ll be wanting to submit it to the App Store. Apple says it aims to have all apps tested and, if approved, in the store within seven days. Towards the end of 2009, it was closer to a month. Don’t make any plans that depend on Apple.

As Tom points out, “I like the missing step between 3 and 4. That step only represents my entire career.”

2009-11-03

what

more

pages