notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2010-10-26

post/1407469382

quote 17:13:48
“ I haven’t been able to pick up a copy of the Independent’s new mini-paper, i. I do already have a big problem with it though. That name. In the age of Google, calling something by a single letter is just a pain in the bum. How are you meant to search for it? ”

Swiss Cheese and Bullets on i. The whole thing is worth a read.

 

(via swisscheeseandbullets)

2010-10-07

On Short Domains

text 00:17:00

There’s been a fair bit of commentary today after Ben Metcalfe’s post about the removal of vb.ly by its domain registrar.

As others have noted, the potential unreliability of Libya as a host for such domains was noticed a year or so ago. This is probably why bit.ly, probably the leading URL shortening service, now also uses j.mp and bitly.com (and supports the use of IDs from any of those on any of their other domain).

However, there are plenty of companies that rely on shorteners that don’t seem to have a non-.ly alternative domain. For example, National Rail enquiries in the UK use ht.ly from Hootsuite, who also use the ow.ly domain, for their short links on Twitter. There’s a chance that both of those could vanish.

Still, there are a couple of other points Metcalfe makes that I’d like to comment on. For example, when he writes

I would suggest that there is a far more concerning issue here if domain registries can decide on the validity of a domain registration based on the content of the website that uses it. I would argue that the two are extricably decoupled and separate entities.

he’s either being naïve or idealistic. While the .com, .net and .org domains might be effective free-for-alls, that’s not true worldwide. I accept that I’ll never be able to register a .nhs.uk or .police.uk domain, for example, and that .it requires that business have a connection with Italy. Meanwhile, there are some domains that never became available at all. The Perl Mongers tried for a while to get a domain from Saint Pierre and Miquelon before they realised that there was no way it was going to happen.

He also says

we contest that any adult content or offensive imagery exists on the site (vb.ly is a url shortener)

which seems disingenuous. A 301 or 302 redirect effectively serves adult content to the requesting user, even if it’s not hosted on the domain itself.

Still, although it’s a shame that Metcalfe had to learn this the hard way, the attention he’s garnered - including a BBC News story - might mean that others are prepared for the fact that domains aren’t forever.

2010-06-21

post/721651920

quote 12:49:08
“ As an analytical framework, economics can come unstuck when dealing with the net. Because while economics is the study of the allocation of scarce resources, the online world is distinguished by abundance. Similarly, ecology (the study of natural systems) specialises in abundance, and it can be useful to look at what’s happening in the media through the eyes of an ecologist. ”
John Naughton in Everything you need to know about the internet, which is deservedly getting linked to everywhere.

2010-06-11

post/687206320

quote 15:52:29
“ What we’re hearing here at the Guardian though is that Apple itself helped to kill off the “unlimited” tag, because it doesn’t like it being used with services that call it “unlimited*” and then explain further down the page in tiny print that that actually * means “subject to ‘fair usage’”. ”

2010-05-10

post/587034059

quote 16:32:00
“ Normal people use the internet now, and they can DESTROY YOU. ”

2010-03-10

post/438776033

photo 10:36:19
Innovation in expanding circles from Wired ReRead, blogging ads from old issues of Wired.

Innovation in expanding circles from Wired ReRead, blogging ads from old issues of Wired.

2010-03-04

post/426163795

quote 12:48:04
“ The BBC’s own Public Purposes, stated in its own charter [all] bellow for investment in network internet content, which will increasingly, inevitably, ineluctably do a better job of achieving these purposes than TV, whether broadcast or on-demand. […] Rather “the Internet” is again and again stated to be core to the future of the way the BBC reaches its audiences — but only if the output of the BBC is restricted to linear programming and the internet is a new pipe for this linear programming. ”
Paul Bennun at Somethin’ Else posting a Our Response to the BBC Strategic Review.

2010-03-01

post/420349697

photo 20:02:50
An advert from a campaign to boost magazine sales, as reported on in the Wall Street Journal’s story, Magazines Team Up To Tout ‘Power of Print’ (via John Gruber).
One line that’s picked up a lot of attention is “Magazines are fleeting. The Internet is immersive.” At least that one’s true; I mean, I’ve never put a pile of internet in the recycling bin after a couple of months of it littering the dining room table.
… oh, wait, I got the nouns the wrong way around. Never mind.

An advert from a campaign to boost magazine sales, as reported on in the Wall Street Journal’s story, Magazines Team Up To Tout ‘Power of Print’ (via John Gruber).

One line that’s picked up a lot of attention is “Magazines are fleeting. The Internet is immersive.” At least that one’s true; I mean, I’ve never put a pile of internet in the recycling bin after a couple of months of it littering the dining room table.

… oh, wait, I got the nouns the wrong way around. Never mind.

what

more

pages