notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2011-01-06

Smells Like Photo Spirit

chat 18:29:56
  • Tom: I assume I'll also have to download this gig of iPhoto again.
  • Paul: How much is iPhoto standalone?
  • Tom: 9 quid.
  • Paul: Bargain.
  • Tom: It's hung in the background and has pegged my CPU. That's how I know it's iPhoto.

2009-07-08

Archiving Twitter Via IRC

text 12:28:00

A couple of people have started posting the sort of thing I’d post here, but split into multiple Twitter posts. Unfortunately, given the absence of meaningful Twitter archiving and the way that the conversations (which can admittedly be useful, but are usually just distracting) drown them in the what you can see on Twitter, they’re quickly lost.

Even using URLs is tricky. For a series of posts, you end up having to open multiple links, and there’s no cohesive narrative. At least that gives you as a user a method of archiving them, but I though there’d be an easier way of doing so.

#2lmc have used a bot to fetch page titles for years. Pairing namer.pl, which only does that, with a from-Subversion copy of URI::Title, which fetches the full content of posts to Twitter, lets you quickly drop in post URLs and extract a conversation. Here’s John Siracusa, last week:

And here’s Fraser Spiers, this morning:

 

Obviously, it’s far from perfect, but at least it’s a single block of text that can be easily edited down to some meaningful sentences. (While the above is captured as text in my IRC logs. I thought it was a bit mean to turn what people might have considered ephemeral into archived HTML, so I’ve posted screnshots of my Terminal window containing the IRC client.)

I may try and do this more in future, or even build a more web-native method of doing so, but then I wonder if, despite the fact that you can’t copyright a post, people might get offended. It also fails (as so many Twitter apps do) when one participant is private. Ah well.

2009-03-22

Against Waffle

chat 18:09:00
  • blech: I think it only has one comment because [the piece] doesn't have a point.
  • blech: You can't argue against waffle.
  • The: You can fight waffle with wiffle.
  • jerakeen: Or syrup.
  • blech: Mmm.

what

more