notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2012-05-10

post/22794717011

quote 21:24:00
“ Tomorrow Never Knows” is a particularly interesting song to examine from a rights perspective. It’s credited to the songwriting team of Lennon and McCartney, but it was written by Lennon, or rather it was Lennon who came up with the ten or so repeated sonorous notes. The actual words were adapted from The Psychedelic Experience: A Manual Based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead, which was co-written by Timothy Leary (among others). But the passages used are from the Bardo Tholo, an 8th Century Buddhist funerary text attributed by tradition to Padmasambhava. So who ultimately wrote the lyrics? Musically, the importance of the song is not its (barely-present) melody or its droning harmonic structure, but its use of audio loops, a technique borrowed from Stockhausen. McCartney was interested in the avant-garde approach but it was George Martin and several EMI technicians that actually got it to work. So who ultimately made the song? And which amongst them will receive a portion of the $250K? ”
John McCoy on Pathetic Fallacy in Surrender to the void, a post about the $250k fee demanded by the Beatles (or rather, the holders of their rights, given half of them are dead). It’s probably worth reading it in context (it’s a short post) but I loved the web of creativity listed here.

(Source: john-mccoy.blogspot.co.uk)

2012-05-07

post/22587871052

photo 15:32:11
Studio Parris Wakefield:

Tasked with the brief of ‘deep space and nebulae’, Howard Wakefield researched through the collection of Nasa imagery at SpaceImages. While tempted with a nebula called Factory, its name was too good to be true, for it didn’t compare with the more expansive deep blue nebula of Hubble NGC 346 SMC. Peter Saville was keen to see how it could be transformed from being purely documentary, so suggested an inverted, monochrome version.

Studio Parris Wakefield:

Tasked with the brief of ‘deep space and nebulae’, Howard Wakefield researched through the collection of Nasa imagery at SpaceImages. While tempted with a nebula called Factory, its name was too good to be true, for it didn’t compare with the more expansive deep blue nebula of Hubble NGC 346 SMC. Peter Saville was keen to see how it could be transformed from being purely documentary, so suggested an inverted, monochrome version.

2012-04-11

post/20925281272

quote 23:12:39
“ There is [a] clear appeal for music bloggers, who have been at the sharp end of some of the music industry’s dysfunctional ways in recent years – fielding takedown requests from a label’s legal team for tracks posted at the explicit request of its marketing team, for example. ”

2012-03-20

2012-03-15

post/19348203240

photos 16:53:21

Occasionally people wonder where I got my usual online nickname from. The answer: these. (via)

2012-03-13

post/19239784532

video 16:35:00

chriswoebken:

Is this in the SF Navy Yards?

From the looks of the crane you can see out of the window at 6’15”, yes, I think it is. (This is apparently a music video for Nothing is Everything by Efdemin.)

(Source: youtube.com)

2012-02-21

post/18033128911

video 22:52:05

For those poor sods who suffered through what Twitter seemed to indicate was an even more banal Brit Awards ceremony than usual, here’s the classic KLF / Extreme Noise Terror performance from 1992:

Unbelievably ENT and the KLF performed this at the Brit Awards 1992, where they made national headlines by firing blanks from a machine gun at the unsuspecting audience and causing chaos at the after show party.

Speaking of the after show party, here’s the Guardian’s description, from a piece on the “key fifty moments in the history of pop music”:

Bill Drummond did his best to shock, firing blanks from an automatic weapon over the heads of the crowd and later dumping a dead sheep with the message: “I died for ewe – bon appetit” tied around its waist at the entrance to one of the post-ceremony parties.

(Other British music ceremony moments of note include Fruitbat of Carter USM flattening Philip Schofield at Smash Hits awards circa 1991 and Jarvis Cocker flapping his bum at Michael Jackson during the Brits in 1996. Hurrah for irreverence.)

2012-02-01

post/16854957783

photo 06:45:05
Casio VL-1, 1980. Photograph by dontpanic on Wikipedia (via)

Casio VL-1, 1980. Photograph by dontpanic on Wikipedia (via)

2012-01-09

On PJ Harvey

text 08:20:56

Ben Ward:

I remember bemusement when I first heard a live recording of ‘Let England Shake’, complete with “Istanbul (Not Constantinople)” refrain; it was not endearing. But when the album arrived, the abrupt, cheery opening melody quickly slides away to expose something more integuing and broody. ‘Let England Shake’ is the most coherent album of the year, and probably of a number of years before too. Musically and thematically, it’s wonderful throughout. It stands apart from PJ Harvey’s other work too. Frustratingly, I’ve missed her touring the album, but I find it difficult to imagine it mixed in with anything else from her extensive career. The record has a high peak, ‘On Battleship Hill’, the incredible ‘England’ through to the final soaring refrain of ‘In The Dark Places’ is a really wonderful set.

I was lucky enough to get a last-minute ticket to PJ Harvey’s show in the Warfield, San Francisco, in April.

Shake

It was a fantastic concert, partly because she pretty much only played music from the album. The material is so thematically linked that most of the other songs wouldn’t have fit, and the solution was simply not to play many.

April was a hard month for me. I was really hitting the first of a couple of bad patches last year, this one centred on a real feeling of homesickness. Despite hardly being a depiction of the best of the nation, Let England Shake really helped remind me of London and the countryside. Seeing the concert was some sort of cathartic, I think.

(NPR has a recording of part of the concert, if you’d like to listen.)

2012-01-03

post/15261539064

quote 23:00:06
“ If Ellen Willis is concerned with pleasure, then Smith’s interest in music is motivated primarily by shame. ”

Rachel Maddox, comparing two female writers on music in a review of their work for Oxford American. I pulled this out because I think it’s fairly insightful in how modern music snobbery works, and because I’m re-evaluating my previous guilty feelings about liking somewhat unfashionable artists like the Pet Shop Boys.

The whole article is well worth a read, though.

what

more

pages