notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2011-07-18

post/7772468422

quote 21:17:07
“ [Murdoch’s] philosophy is simple – let the market decide. He is so wedded to this spuriously democratic formula that he believes it is elitist for journalists to set standards of taste and ethics. If the people want it, give it to them. The inevitable result was appealing to the lowest common denominator. ”
Roy Greenslade: How Murdoch’s philosophy created a climate of misbehaviour, from his Guardian column.

2011-05-30

post/6012422904

quote 22:00:49
“ The email accounts of the Guardian, Times, Financial Times and Telegraph are all managed by Google. ”

James Ball in the Guardian’s Comment is Free: Give Twitter credit for trying to stand up to the courts – unlike others.

Is it really true that four of the five old broadsheets have outsourced email to Google? It’s both plausible yet, somehow, deeply worrying.

2010-11-12

post/1553422982

photo 17:22:00
A wide angle of the shot that featured on a bunch of UK newspaper front pages on Thursday: 

See also: this John Harris comment piece in the Guardian. Well worth a read.
(Picture via, via)

A wide angle of the shot that featured on a bunch of UK newspaper front pages on Thursday: 

See also: this John Harris comment piece in the Guardian. Well worth a read.

(Picture via, via)

2010-03-26

post/475042302

quote 16:50:00
“ For people who think that paywalls or the iPad are the things that will be the magic bullet that saves the newspaper industry from falling over a cliff I think there’s an easier answer; more randomness/serendipity, please. ”

2010-03-09

post/436567543

quote 09:40:06
“ Ben Terrett’s Newspaper Club won in the Graphics category in the Design Of The Year thingat the Design Museum. Which I’m especially pleased about because, if anything, what we do is remove the graphic design from things. ”
Russell Davies, in 1966 weeks, his weeknote.

2009-06-28

post/131806751

quote 19:20:00
“ Wouldn’t happen at the Guardian, now would it Simon? ”

Richard Rutter, commenting on the Best Daily Mail poll ever, one of Simon Willison’s images on Flickr, and the fact the Mail withdrew a gamed online poll.

Well, it now looks like there is an analogue at the Guardian; their page asking “is it time to return the Parthenon Marbles” is currently running 95% in favour. I also note it’s “most read” on the site, and a quick use of bit.ly finds posts like this on Twitter.

I doubt the Guardian will take this down, but I would love to know if the data is recorded with a guess as the location of a voter, whether there’s evidence of a surge of Greek (and other) voters visiting the poll and leaving the site, and the answer to similar questions. (I realise that there are good reasons we can’t have such data, but it can’t hurt to wonder.)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Economist’s leader is also one of its most commented-on articles at the moment. (I liked their coverage of the museum, by the way.)

Two last points: firstly, the URL has the phrase “Elgin marbles” while the page’s title uses “Parthenon Marbles”. As names matter, this is an interesting disparity. Secondly, when I tried to post this as a comment on Flickr, it labelled one of the URLs I’ve referred to as “used for abuse”. Hmmm.

2009-04-10

2009-02-05

post/75830919

photo 09:48:00
Google puts spy in your pocket - provided you have the right sort of phone, sign in, and then approve the people who you want to spy on you. Who writes this nonsense, exactly?
As for “Anyone who left their phone in a bar could be ‘covertly opted in’, [Simon Davies] claimed.”, well, software installation on mobiles must have got a hell of a lot easier since the last time I tried it.
[Edit] On balance, Meg’s response might have been healthier.

Google puts spy in your pocket - provided you have the right sort of phone, sign in, and then approve the people who you want to spy on you. Who writes this nonsense, exactly?

As for “Anyone who left their phone in a bar could be ‘covertly opted in’, [Simon Davies] claimed.”, well, software installation on mobiles must have got a hell of a lot easier since the last time I tried it.

[Edit] On balance, Meg’s response might have been healthier.

2009-02-04

post/75708687

photo 23:04:00
You might have noticed that it snowed in London earlier this week. It dominated the front pages, but there wasn’t realy a single defining image.
However, the Independent used versions of the two images used by more than one paper: the policeman in a snow-covered helmet (which got used in three different variants), and a crowd of people (on Parliament Hill?) which the Mirror also used as its front page lead.
However, I think my favourite is the Telegraph’s picture of the Palace of Westminster (which sat on both Monday and Tuesday, despite the snow).
Front pages courtesy of Sky News (and if there’d been a 13th paper, I’d have spared you the Star).

You might have noticed that it snowed in London earlier this week. It dominated the front pages, but there wasn’t realy a single defining image.

However, the Independent used versions of the two images used by more than one paper: the policeman in a snow-covered helmet (which got used in three different variants), and a crowd of people (on Parliament Hill?) which the Mirror also used as its front page lead.

However, I think my favourite is the Telegraph’s picture of the Palace of Westminster (which sat on both Monday and Tuesday, despite the snow).

Front pages courtesy of Sky News (and if there’d been a 13th paper, I’d have spared you the Star).

2009-01-01

post/67850191

quote 21:04:57
“ Taleb is scathing about the value of daily newspapers in general, recommending a total rejection of them - “additional knowledge of the minutiae of daily business can be useless, even actually toxic ”
Dan Hill, himself quoting from the book by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan. I must admit, I do often think I’d be better off ignoring day-to-day news and just using the Economist (although I’d love a similarly meaty alternative to it).

what

more

pages