<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description>Paul Mison’s random stuff that doesn’t go elsewhere. Is it microblogging, or microactivity?

(Previously known as ‘tumblr is my sock drawer’, for reasons that are somewhat unclear.)</description><title>notes.husk.org</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @blech)</generator><link>http://notes.husk.org/</link><item><title>roomthily:

redesigning graphics from 1950s science textbooks by...</title><description>&lt;img src="http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kt2y9vdrnu1qzf03eo1_500.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://roomthily.tumblr.com/post/243226159"&gt;roomthily&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;redesigning graphics from 1950s science textbooks by R.A. Gallant (via &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/ff_vintagescience"&gt;Wired&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder if I’m the only person to find the originals better than the remakes? They’re far less fussy and seem to be somewhat clearer. The newer versions put too much effort into being pretty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe I’m just old.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://notes.husk.org/post/243733352</link><guid>http://notes.husk.org/post/243733352</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate><category>image</category><category>reblog</category><category>visualisation</category><category>wired</category><category>r a gallant</category></item></channel></rss>

