notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2011-07-03

post/7205312908

quote 23:19:06
“ Finally, years after being first elected, Bradlaugh was at last allowed to take his seat thanks to a cool and masterly coup by the speaker, Arthur Wellesley Peel, Sir Robert’s youngest son. No sooner had Peel been re-elected speaker on 12 January 1885 than he got up and said: ‘I have come clearly and without hesitation to the conclusion that it would neither be my duty to prohibit the honourable gentleman from coming nor to permit a motion to be made standing between him and his taking of the oath.’ The leader of the House, Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, rose to object. The speaker silenced him, reminding him that Hicks-Beach had himself not yet taken the oath. And that was the end of it. ”

Ferdinand Mount in the subscriber-only LRB article Get off your knees, a review of a biography of Charles Bradlaugh, noted Victorian atheist, campaigner and politician.

As an atheist, he wasn’t allowed to take the oath of office in the Houses of Parliament, to which he as elected in 1880, for six years. The passage above describes the legal manoerver (well, I’d use the word “hack”) that the new Speaker used to finally let him take his seat.

2011-05-23

post/5773763180

quote 20:10:00
“ 55 percent of Americans believe that the faithful will be taken up to heaven in the Rapture, according to a Newsweek poll in 2004. ”
Colleen O’Connor: Revelation relevancy (from the Denver Post, but republished in the San Diego Union-Tribune, from 2005).

2010-12-20

post/2380943846

quote 01:14:24
“ Bring them up believing in God and they’ll be good and law abiding. It’s a perfect system. Well, nearly. 75 percent of Americans are God-­‐fearing Christians; 75 percent of prisoners are God-­‐fearing Christians. 10 percent of Americans are atheists; 0.2 percent of prisoners are atheists. ”

2010-01-03

On New Year

text 21:24:00

I’d forgotten - until yesterday - that the epic post on calendars and blue moons, on the Panic blog, had made me think about doing a post about the changes in New Years. So, before 2010 properly gets going (with most people going back to work tomorrow), I thought I’d try and get this out while it’s still topical.

You’d think the concept of a new year was straightforward. After all, it’s right there: the date is 1/1 (whether you’re European or American), and given we don’t use 0 for dates¹, that’s the first day of the year, right? Well, yes, it is now, for a good chunk of the world’s population. It wasn’t always.

Readers of Pepy’s Diary will know that; indeed, the entry for 1st January 1666/1667 bears two dates. Until the UK changed to the Julian calendar in 1752, the first day of the year was on the Feast of the Annunciation, Lady Day, marking the occasion of Mary’s meeting with the Angel Gabriel. Before then, dates for the first third of the year carry both the date of the Julian and Gregorian year. The British tax year still starts on this date, with (complicated) adjustments for the days lost when the calendar changed.

That’s not the only “new year”, though. Parliamentary years start with the State Opening, in November (or, occasionally) December; the Catholic and Anglican liturgical year also starts in December. Meanwhile the academic year starts after harvest in September. (Australia’s also starts in late summer.) Admittedly, none of those has as much legal force as the calendar or tax year, but still, I thought them worth mentioning.

That’s just in the UK, of course. There are two other obvious major world calendars, both lunar. The Chinese new year (also celebrated in Korea and Vietnam, but not Japan, which swapped to the Western calendar in 1873) is based on a lunar-solar calendar, so it moves around, but not much: it’s defined as the second new moon after the winter solstice, fixing it to a date between 21 January and 21 February (with thanks to this PDF, which did all the sums for me).

Meanwhile, the Hijri calendar, used by Muslims, is a pure lunar calendar, with nothing fixing it to the solar year. As a result, the Islamic new year shifts by either 11 or 12 days a year, moving through the Western calendar every 30 years or so. Even more alarmingly for those used to the rigid certainty of solar reckoning, the first day doesn’t happen until the new moon is officially sighted: this can shift the start of the year back a day, in theory at least. In 2009, the first day of Muharram, the first month, was on 18 December.

I’m not even going to try and explain the various Indian new year’s days, except to note that most of them seem to be around the northern hemisphere spring equinox.

So, happy new year, unless you’re Islamic, in which case, belated happy new year, or Asian, in which case, it’ll soon by new year, unless you’re Japanese, in which case: happy new year.

¹ There’s an exception: astronomers have a year 0, and their convention has been adopted by ISO 8601.

2009-01-09

post/69370012

photo 13:50:00
“Atheist Bus” Tube Cards - including Einstein’s refutation of a personal God.

“Atheist Bus” Tube Cards - including Einstein’s refutation of a personal God.

about

options