notes.husk.org. scribblings by Paul Mison.

2013-04-09

post/47564756393

photo 22:24:00
Left: renaissance-era Florence, Italy. Right: a single freeway interchange in Atlanta, GA. Same scale.
Image posted by Max Chanowitz in his answer to Why are San Franciscans so against freeway construction? on Quora. Originally posted by Steve Mouzon in The Price Of Speed.

Left: renaissance-era Florence, Italy. Right: a single freeway interchange in Atlanta, GA. Same scale.

Image posted by Max Chanowitz in his answer to Why are San Franciscans so against freeway construction? on Quora. Originally posted by Steve Mouzon in The Price Of Speed.

2013-03-14

post/45306730639

quote 00:31:59
“ I call the ideology that legitimizes and sanctions such aspirations “solutionism.” I borrow this unabashedly pejorative term from the world of architecture and urban planning, where it has come to refer to an unhealthy preoccupation with sexy, monumental, and narrow-minded solutions—the kind of stuff that wows audiences at TED Conferences—to problems that are extremely complex, fluid, and contentious. These are the kinds of problems that, on careful examination, do not have to be defined in the singular and all-encompassing ways that “solutionists” have defined them; what’s contentious, then, is not their proposed solution but their very definition of the problem itself. ”

Toward a Complex, Realistic, and Moral Tech Criticism (via timoarnall)

This reminds me of some of the later sections of Fashioning Apollo, which examines how the systems thinking of Apollo programme (itself influenced strongly by the military) failed utterly when it was applied to architecture and city planning.

It strikes me now, reading the quote, that Apollo had a very easily stated problem (it’s so memorable it is itself quotable: “send a man to the moon and return him safely to the earth”), while agreeing what the problem with a city is (too crowded? crowded in the wrong places? too sparse?) is itself a complicated starting point.

(via timoarnall)

2012-11-25

post/36537674051

photos 21:11:00

Top: China Basin parking lot, near AT&T Park, San Francisco.

Bottom: roughly half of Soho, from Soho Square south and west, London.

The two screenshots of Google Maps were taken at the same zoom level (17). Due to them being at different latitudes, the full size London image has more pixels, but covers the same width (about 460m). (Unzoomed, the two images have the same distance per pixel.)

2012-08-11

post/29211416527

quote 20:45:53
“ Democracy has a pretty poor track record of building great cities. The great cities of the world that we travel to see were built by benevolent despots ”
Eric Kuhne, head designer at the multinational firm CivicArts, and architect of Bluewater, quoted by Owen Hatherley in his Guardian article, Bluewater thrives by not alarming shoppers with anything new or strange. I’d argue London and New York disprove that one.

2012-04-01

post/20296781908

quote 18:59:06
“ By the mid-1970s, this notion that you could directly apply systems engineering to urban problems was fairly soundly repudiated. There was this perception that we had mastered this enormous amount of complexity and it turns out that putting a man on the moon is fairly simple. It’s technologically challenging, given that the sheer amount of force and energy and orbital trajectories that need to be harnessed and negotiated are enormous in scale. But it’s a problem with relatively few variables whereas the city is problem with an enormous number of interconnected variables in which these systems engineering approaches have little applicability. ”

Nicholas de Monchaux replying to questions in an interview about Spacesuit: Fashioning Apollo, at Txchnologist.

(See also.)

2012-02-21

post/18034810422

photos 23:19:00

vizualize:

Maps of London and New York by Isotype Institute (1944)

I rarely repost things that are this popular, but how could I not note  this comparison of the growth of two of my favourite cities, and the wonderful way the Isotype designers made their growth clear?

As well as the obvious difference between the organic and grid layouts in the two, I also noticed the small changes in water use (note the new Millwall docks on the Isle of Dogs) in London and the much more obvious infilling in New York and New Jersey.

(via seanaes)

2012-01-30

post/16755128380

quote 10:24:05
“ Cars spend just 5 percent of their lives in motion. ”
A diverting statistic from Between the Lines, a feature on parking in that city from Los Angeles magazine.

2011-07-26

post/8062286310

photo 00:52:43
Helicopter pads, LA, from the NY Times slideshow: Helicopters Fill the Airspace Above Los Angeles (via). Photograph: Monica Almelda.

Helicopter pads, LA, from the NY Times slideshow: Helicopters Fill the Airspace Above Los Angeles (via). Photograph: Monica Almelda.

2011-05-09

post/5337934564

quote 18:29:00
“ All the surveys use an index. But what is on it? “There’s always proximity to nature,” says Tyler Brûlé (editor of Monocle and patron saint of liveable cities and airport lounges. ”

Edwin Heathcote quoting Tyler Brûlé in the Financial Times piece Liveable v lovable, critiquing those “best cities to live in” lists that never list the cities people actually live in (notably London and New York). It’s doing the rounds, and it’s well worth a read.

This quote leapt out at me, because (as I mentioned in my post about driving), one of the best things about San Francisco is, apparently, that it’s easy to leave. Call me a dyed in the wool urbanophile, but isn’t the point of a good city that you don’t want to?

2010-11-30

Concentric Londons

text 05:26:00

There are many concentric definitions of London. This probably isn’t an exhaustive list of the potential boundaries, but let’s give it a go. (For this version, there aren’t any links, nor are there maps. Consider this a work of geography, not cartography.)

Londonium

or, Roman London. Defined by London Wall, the remains of which are still visible. Tiny, but still more or less discernable.

The City Of London

Historic, rich, and a strange sort of local authority, the City is (just over) a mile square (hence its nickname) on the north bank of the Thames (although it maintains four road bridges, and one footbridge). Find its boundaries by looking for griffins on poles.

The Cities of London and Westminster

Combine the old centres, which meet on the Thames, and you have this double-headed beast (and parliamentary consitituency, although excludes the northern part of the Borough of Westminster).

The Inner Ring Road

A selection of numbered roads provides the boundary for the central Congestion Charge area, and one definition of “central London”.

The Civil War Defences

Built in 1642 to defend the Parliamentary capital, 11 miles of wall take in an area from Shoreditch to Hyde Park, and Vauxhall to Rotherhithe.

Zone 1

Transport for London’s central fare boundary, which reaches a bit beyond the ring road. Of course, with nine zones, there are further boundaries outside this one, useful for bragging rights (and saving money on a Travelcard).

071

In 1990, Ofcom broke London’s old 01 telephone code in two, introducing 071. After two more changes, the city now has a single area code, 020, but there’s still plenty of numbers (and people who’ll remove the space) to testify to the old distinction the between “inner” and “outer” codes.

Inner London

Originally defined in the Metropolis Management Act of 1855, finally given a sane system of government in 1889 (as London County Council) and lingering since 1965 as a definition for local government financing, these twelve modern London boroughs (and the City) form a large, but not all-encompassing, core.

Inside the Circulars

The North Circular, a hodge-podge of custom-built dual carriageway and converted streets, and the South Circular, which is barely a trunk road at all, form a ring around a certain definition of the place.

The London Postal District

Taking in eight postcode areas, this area’s been slowly contracting for years. Even bits of TfL’s zone 4 are outside it.

020

The larger, current, telephone code for London, which manages to not match the legislative boundary at all.

The Green Belt

Aimed at ending sprawl after the war, the green belt more or less worked. Its inner boundary stopped London’s expansion (especially in the north-west, where the Tube was once to have been extended.)

Greater London

Defined in 1963, made a council in 1965, and currently the area that elects the London Mayor, eight MEPs, and 25 GLA members. This is the fuzzy shape most Londoners will recognise as a map of their city, I’d say.

The M25

Planned as part of the post-war London Ringway schemes, mangled to fit, and labelled the Road to Hell, the London Orbital - 120 miles long, and roughly 15 miles from the centre - is a usefully physical boundary to the city.

TfL Zone 9

You can get outside the M25 by Tube, even without going to zone 9 (Epping, on the Central Line), but by going into the strange new zones that used to be letters, you can get a long way north-west, into the wilds of Buckinghamshire.

Travel to Work Region

London’s economic impact sprawls well beyond any of these relatively well known (if messy) boundaries. A map drawn to define an area such that it contain 85% of those working within it reaches the Essex coast, nearly to Cambridge, and most of the way to Brighton. Similarly, one that allows up to 25% of people to be commuters draws in districts up to 30 miles away.

After that, London’s influence bleeds away, to be submerged in the rest of the south east.

(This is a response of sorts to Oliver O’Brien’s piece, Where is London?)

what

more

pages