<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description>Paul Mison’s random stuff that doesn’t go elsewhere. Is it microblogging, or microactivity?

(Previously known as ‘tumblr is my sock drawer’, for reasons that are somewhat unclear.)</description><title>notes.husk.org</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @blech)</generator><link>http://notes.husk.org/</link><item><title>On Short Domains</title><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#8217;s been a fair bit of commentary today after Ben Metcalfe&amp;#8217;s post about the &lt;a href="http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/2010/10/the-ly-domain-space-to-be-considered-unsafe/"&gt;removal of vb.ly&lt;/a&gt; by its domain registrar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/RodBegbie/status/26567503650"&gt;others have noted&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://workbench.cadenhead.org/news/3503/bitly-builds-business-libya-domain"&gt;potential unreliability of Libya&lt;/a&gt; as a host for such domains was noticed a year or so ago. This is probably why &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;, probably the leading URL shortening service, now also uses j.mp and bitly.com (and supports the use of IDs from any of those on any of their other domain).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, there are plenty of companies that rely on shorteners that don&amp;#8217;t seem to have a non-.ly alternative domain. For example, &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/nationalrailenq"&gt;National Rail enquiries&lt;/a&gt; in the UK use ht.ly from Hootsuite, who also use the ow.ly domain, for their short links on Twitter. There&amp;#8217;s a chance that both of those could vanish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, there are a couple of other points Metcalfe makes that I&amp;#8217;d like to comment on. For example, when he writes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I would suggest that there is a far more concerning issue here if domain registries can decide on the validity of a domain registration based on the content of the website that uses it. I would argue that the two are extricably decoupled and separate entities.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;he&amp;#8217;s either being naïve or idealistic. While the .com, .net and .org domains might be effective free-for-alls, that&amp;#8217;s not true worldwide. I accept that I&amp;#8217;ll never be able to register a .nhs.uk or .police.uk domain, for example, and that .it requires that business have a connection with Italy. Meanwhile, there are some domains that never became available at all. The Perl Mongers tried for a while to get a domain from Saint Pierre and Miquelon before they realised that there was no way it was going to happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also says&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;we contest that any adult content or offensive imagery exists on the site (vb.ly is a url shortener)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which seems disingenuous. A 301 or 302 redirect effectively serves adult content to the requesting user, even if it&amp;#8217;s not hosted on the domain itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, although it&amp;#8217;s a shame that Metcalfe had to learn this the hard way, the attention he&amp;#8217;s garnered - including a &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11484751"&gt;BBC News story&lt;/a&gt; - might mean that others are prepared for the fact that domains aren&amp;#8217;t forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://notes.husk.org/post/1258467157</link><guid>http://notes.husk.org/post/1258467157</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:17:00 +0100</pubDate><category>post</category><category>internet</category><category>url</category><category>url shortener</category><category>libya</category><category>bit.ly</category></item></channel></rss>
